Impatient Cycling

The forum for puffers that either live or start in brackish biotopes: GSPs, F8s, Ceylons & more.
Jivenjune
Green Spotted Puffer
Posts: 303
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2009 3:30 am
Gender: Male
My Puffers: (2) GSPs in a 60 gallon.
Location (country): California.

Re: Impatient Cycling

Post by Jivenjune »

LilGreenPuffer wrote:No, the bacteria can use the ammonia after you use Prime. It doesn't affect the bacteria at all.
I think what some of the members are arguing for is that by treating the tank with Prime, I would starve any remaining bacteria regardless. I'd question how long prime remains active at removing ammonia before an ammonia buildup resumes its normal status. From my understanding, bacteria (as long as it's submerged in non-chlorinated water) can sustain its life for at least a short period of time. The exact digits, I'm not quite sure.

Truthfully, I just wanted to know if it was possible to increase the salinity by at least .004 per week without crashing everything within the tank. Too risky at the moment, it seems. I'll be patient. It's just interesting to know whether it's possible or not if anyone has actually experimented with this through rigorous testing.
bigfatfish
Fahaka Puffer
Posts: 938
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 3:33 pm
Gender: Female
My Puffers: GSP "Puffy" RIP old friend 1999-2009
GSPs "Flash" & "Lionel" - in a 55 UK Gallon Bow front Marine Tank with sump.
Location (country): United Kingdom
Location: Devon, UK

Re: Impatient Cycling

Post by bigfatfish »

Not sure it is something I would risk. I'd take the "patience is a virtue" route!
User avatar
LilGreenPuffer
Former Staff Member
Posts: 5301
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 11:26 pm
Gender: Female
My Puffers: Dwarf puffer - Thumbelina (only mine in my heart now; she lives in CT with my friend)

RIP Inigo Montoya, Fezzik, and Vizinni.
RIP James Bond.
Location (country): United States
Location: Kentucky

Re: Impatient Cycling

Post by LilGreenPuffer »

Jivenjune wrote:
LilGreenPuffer wrote:No, the bacteria can use the ammonia after you use Prime. It doesn't affect the bacteria at all.
I'd question how long prime remains active at removing ammonia before an ammonia buildup resumes its normal status.
I think that it's 24hrs. If anyone else knows differently, do please say so!
"I will give you a talisman. Whenever you are in doubt, or when the self becomes too much with you, apply the following test. Recall the face of the poorest and the weakest man whom you may have seen, and ask yourself, if the step you contemplate is going to be of any use to him or her. Will she gain anything by it? Will it restore her to a control over her own life and destiny? In other words, will it lead to freedom for the hungry and spiritually starving millions? Then you will find your doubts and your self melt away."

Found among the papers of Mohatma Gandhi


Image

Come and visit http://www.thetriopsforum.com!

I AM A DUDETTE!

NEED NITRIFYING BACTERIA FOR YOUR NEW TANK? PM ME!
User avatar
Dadof4
Tech Team
Posts: 2862
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2008 5:50 am
Gender: Male
My Puffers: 1 GSP (Microfiche) RIP, 1 Monotrete Turgidus (Leon) in a 30gal. 1 Monotrete suvattii in a 40 gal FW. 120 gallon BW with 3 juvenile Dragon Gobies (so cool). 55 gal with a 2" GSP named Hank. 180 gallon being set up for a Fahaka in the next few months!
Location (country): United States
Location: North Wisconsin

Re: Impatient Cycling

Post by Dadof4 »

Jivenjune wrote:
LilGreenPuffer wrote:No, the bacteria can use the ammonia after you use Prime. It doesn't affect the bacteria at all.
I think what some of the members are arguing for is that by treating the tank with Prime, I would starve any remaining bacteria regardless. I'd question how long prime remains active at removing ammonia before an ammonia buildup resumes its normal status. From my understanding, bacteria (as long as it's submerged in non-chlorinated water) can sustain its life for at least a short period of time. The exact digits, I'm not quite sure.

Truthfully, I just wanted to know if it was possible to increase the salinity by at least .004 per week without crashing everything within the tank. Too risky at the moment, it seems. I'll be patient. It's just interesting to know whether it's possible or not if anyone has actually experimented with this through rigorous testing.
Yeah, it has been tested that .002 is the maximum amount you can increase in a weeks time. Basically what it amounts to is osmotic push/pull. You have to move slow when raising SG because inside the bacterial cell there is sodium/potassium/protein dissolved in the plasma. The dissolved amount is roughly equal to what the SG (in a round about way) is in the surrounding fluid (your tank water) give or take a slight amount. I won't go in to an in-depth lesson on osmotic push/pull (unless you'd like me too), but this balance keeps fluid from rapidly shifting in and out of a cell. If you increase the amount of sodium and potassium in the surrounding fluid by too much and upset this balance you will cause a massive shift of fluid (fluid moves from the lowest concentration of positive ions to the highest concentration) from in the bacterial cell to the outside of the bacterial cell causing cell wall collapse and death.

As for the Prime, it chemically binds to ammonia to form Ammonium leaving it available to nitrosomonas bacteria. I don't think there is a time limit on how long it stays bound. Remember if you have ammonia in your tank and use something like Prime and test after adding it you may get a false positive ammonia reading because ammonium and ammonia are so chemically similar.
"Darwin swings...annnnnnd a miss. Boy Jim, Chuck's suffered at the plate tonight. He's 0 for 3 and I'm not sure he's recovered from that shoulder pull a few weeks ago. I'll bet the front office is re-thinking that contract."
Jivenjune
Green Spotted Puffer
Posts: 303
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2009 3:30 am
Gender: Male
My Puffers: (2) GSPs in a 60 gallon.
Location (country): California.

Re: Impatient Cycling

Post by Jivenjune »

Well, I just purchased two separate hydrometers, and they're both giving different readings. I have one of those glass thermometer hydrometers and the swing-arm type of hydrometer. The swing-arm type I just received today from Drs. Foster and Smith. It indicates my current salinity as being between 1.015. The bouncy looking thermometer one indicates it to be at roughly 1.010-1.011. I take it that the swing arm type are more reliable?

Tank hasn't question, though I haven't been raising the salinity by anymore than .002 per week and sometimes only raising it by that much every two weeks. I guess there's no point to being impatient; I'm already almost done with hitting marine salinity. Marine is considered 1.020?

Thank you for info, Dad. Much appreciated. Same with everyone's replies.
Last edited by Jivenjune on Thu Oct 08, 2009 5:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
bazil323
Green Spotted Puffer
Posts: 312
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 1:51 pm
Gender: Female
My Puffers: Two Figure 8 puffer, Grun & Schnitzel
Location (country): Northern Wisconsin, USA
Location: Northern Wisconsin

Re: Impatient Cycling

Post by bazil323 »

Oh, that makes sense. I've never really read into Prime or the like as I'm on well water. I just assumed that however it neutralized made it unusable for the bacteria, good to clear that up.
Jivenjune
Green Spotted Puffer
Posts: 303
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2009 3:30 am
Gender: Male
My Puffers: (2) GSPs in a 60 gallon.
Location (country): California.

Re: Impatient Cycling

Post by Jivenjune »

Dadof4 wrote:
Jivenjune wrote:
LilGreenPuffer wrote:No, the bacteria can use the ammonia after you use Prime. It doesn't affect the bacteria at all.
I think what some of the members are arguing for is that by treating the tank with Prime, I would starve any remaining bacteria regardless. I'd question how long prime remains active at removing ammonia before an ammonia buildup resumes its normal status. From my understanding, bacteria (as long as it's submerged in non-chlorinated water) can sustain its life for at least a short period of time. The exact digits, I'm not quite sure.

Truthfully, I just wanted to know if it was possible to increase the salinity by at least .004 per week without crashing everything within the tank. Too risky at the moment, it seems. I'll be patient. It's just interesting to know whether it's possible or not if anyone has actually experimented with this through rigorous testing.
Yeah, it has been tested that .002 is the maximum amount you can increase in a weeks time. Basically what it amounts to is osmotic push/pull. You have to move slow when raising SG because inside the bacterial cell there is sodium/potassium/protein dissolved in the plasma. The dissolved amount is roughly equal to what the SG (in a round about way) is in the surrounding fluid (your tank water) give or take a slight amount. I won't go in to an in-depth lesson on osmotic push/pull (unless you'd like me too), but this balance keeps fluid from rapidly shifting in and out of a cell. If you increase the amount of sodium and potassium in the surrounding fluid by too much and upset this balance you will cause a massive shift of fluid (fluid moves from the lowest concentration of positive ions to the highest concentration) from in the bacterial cell to the outside of the bacterial cell causing cell wall collapse and death.

As for the Prime, it chemically binds to ammonia to form Ammonium leaving it available to nitrosomonas bacteria. I don't think there is a time limit on how long it stays bound. Remember if you have ammonia in your tank and use something like Prime and test after adding it you may get a false positive ammonia reading because ammonium and ammonia are so chemically similar.
Out of curiosity, is ammonia similar to nitrites as ammonium would be to nitrates?
User avatar
Dadof4
Tech Team
Posts: 2862
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2008 5:50 am
Gender: Male
My Puffers: 1 GSP (Microfiche) RIP, 1 Monotrete Turgidus (Leon) in a 30gal. 1 Monotrete suvattii in a 40 gal FW. 120 gallon BW with 3 juvenile Dragon Gobies (so cool). 55 gal with a 2" GSP named Hank. 180 gallon being set up for a Fahaka in the next few months!
Location (country): United States
Location: North Wisconsin

Re: Impatient Cycling

Post by Dadof4 »

The ammonium would still break down in to nitrites like ammonia would.
"Darwin swings...annnnnnd a miss. Boy Jim, Chuck's suffered at the plate tonight. He's 0 for 3 and I'm not sure he's recovered from that shoulder pull a few weeks ago. I'll bet the front office is re-thinking that contract."
Jivenjune
Green Spotted Puffer
Posts: 303
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2009 3:30 am
Gender: Male
My Puffers: (2) GSPs in a 60 gallon.
Location (country): California.

Re: Impatient Cycling

Post by Jivenjune »

Dadof4 wrote:The ammonium would still break down in to nitrites like ammonia would.
I was thinking more in terms of toxicity. Is ammonium equivalent in terms of toxicity to nitrates? Or is ammonium more toxic of a substance?
User avatar
Dadof4
Tech Team
Posts: 2862
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2008 5:50 am
Gender: Male
My Puffers: 1 GSP (Microfiche) RIP, 1 Monotrete Turgidus (Leon) in a 30gal. 1 Monotrete suvattii in a 40 gal FW. 120 gallon BW with 3 juvenile Dragon Gobies (so cool). 55 gal with a 2" GSP named Hank. 180 gallon being set up for a Fahaka in the next few months!
Location (country): United States
Location: North Wisconsin

Re: Impatient Cycling

Post by Dadof4 »

Ahhhh! Misunderstood! Ammonium is harmless but it breaks down to nitrite.
"Darwin swings...annnnnnd a miss. Boy Jim, Chuck's suffered at the plate tonight. He's 0 for 3 and I'm not sure he's recovered from that shoulder pull a few weeks ago. I'll bet the front office is re-thinking that contract."
Jivenjune
Green Spotted Puffer
Posts: 303
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2009 3:30 am
Gender: Male
My Puffers: (2) GSPs in a 60 gallon.
Location (country): California.

Re: Impatient Cycling

Post by Jivenjune »

Dadof4 wrote:Ahhhh! Misunderstood! Ammonium is harmless but it breaks down to nitrite.
Thanks. Much appreciated.
User avatar
mrgreen
Fahaka Puffer
Posts: 983
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:17 pm
Gender: Female
My Puffers: 1 dwarf puffer: Squirt
2 figure 8s: Escalator & Elevator
Location (country): United States
Location: Michigan, USA
Contact:

Re: Impatient Cycling

Post by mrgreen »

:worship: Dadof4 for his chemistry knowlege!
"Puffs puff cuz they're puffs cuz they puff cuz they're puffs. - Nathan age 12
User avatar
Pufferpunk
Queen Admin
Posts: 32979
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 11:06 am
Gender: Female
My Puffers: Puffers I have kept:
T lineatus
T miurus
A modestus
T biocellatus
C valentini
C coranata
C papuan
C lorteti
DPs
suvattii
burrfish
T niphobles
Location (country): USA, Greenville, SC
Location: Greenville, SC
Contact:

Re: Impatient Cycling

Post by Pufferpunk »

About the hydrometers--I believe the glass ones are very accurate, IF you know what temp they have been calibrated for. The swing arm ones are also very accurate, IF you have it calibrated against a calibrated refractometer or calibrate it yourself with calibration solution. My public aquarium uses the swingarm type.
You are getting sleepy... you only hear the sound of my voice... you must do water changes... water changes... water changes... water changes...

"The solution to pollution is dilution!"
Post Reply