Whoever this Andywg condescending idiot is, I just want to punch him in his arrogant face. The fish grabbing didn't bother me as much as his horrible attitude towards the other members on the forum. It made my day to read "And you having swallowed an encyclopedia does not make it any better." from you.
Anyway, I was on a mission just now to search for scientific articles that call porcupine puffers "puffers", just to prove Andywg's statement, "My contentnion is that you will not see a scientific text referring to a porcupinefish as a pufferfish, thus they technically are not puffers.", wrong.
Here are only 2 of the examples from a long list that I found:
Alexis M. Wiktorowicz, Dean V. Lauritzen and Malcolm S. Gordon (2007) Powered control mechanisms contributing to dynamically stable swimming in
porcupine puffers (Teleostei: Diodon holocanthus), Experiments in Fluids, 43(5): 725-735
Yoshinaga, T. Akiyama, K. Nishida, S. Nakane, M. Ogawa, K. Hirose, H. (2007) In vitro culture technique for Cryptocaryon irritans, a parasitic ciliate of marine teleosts, DISEASES OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS, 78(2) 155-160 . "A
porcupine puffer Diodon holo- canthus infected with Cryptocaryon irritans was obtained ..."
S u c k that, Mr. Better-than-you-in-every-way!
t1gerbee wrote:http://www.ultimatereef.net/forums/show ... p?t=291331
he says...
'It turns out that by holding onto a porcupinefish he will start to inflate, which is a fun thing to do. I am assuming he doesn't mind that much as I grabbed him 3 times for these photos and each time he swam off and then swam back into my hand for a stroke before slowly inflating and swimming out.'
What the? Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!
and he surlaW at anyone who calls it a 'puffer' fish, because technically it is from the two teeth family, not four theet family, and therefore not a puffer.
The arrogance of this man, combined with his apparent cruellness just made me MAD!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!