Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2007 7:45 am
Let him grow. Adults are much easier to tell apart. Care for them is similar anyway, so the name is not that important.
The target puffer group needs revision. Without revision it will not be possible to make id keys for this group. There is a key on this group in the aqualog by ebert, but I do not think it is very reliable, since the knowledge requiered seems not to be avaiable, yet.
About turgidus: The diagnosis by kottelat states that this species never has an ocellus, but some turgidus pictures send to ebert by kottelat himself show a large colored spot. The diagnosis of turgidus seems incomplete anyway, although the work of kottelat is superb in general.
About cochinchinensis: Although the first pictures looked as if it could be this species the newer pictures show a snout which is too long for a cochinchinensis (thread page 2, first picture), which is differentiated from the other species by its short snout.
The target puffer group needs revision. Without revision it will not be possible to make id keys for this group. There is a key on this group in the aqualog by ebert, but I do not think it is very reliable, since the knowledge requiered seems not to be avaiable, yet.
About turgidus: The diagnosis by kottelat states that this species never has an ocellus, but some turgidus pictures send to ebert by kottelat himself show a large colored spot. The diagnosis of turgidus seems incomplete anyway, although the work of kottelat is superb in general.
About cochinchinensis: Although the first pictures looked as if it could be this species the newer pictures show a snout which is too long for a cochinchinensis (thread page 2, first picture), which is differentiated from the other species by its short snout.