What are your views on the lack of concensus about salinity levels for F8 puffers? I'm quite intrigued by this, and would be happy to hear about your views and the reasoning behind it.
A few websites (like Seriouslyfish) recommend freshwater. We all "know" freshwater is a common misconception, at least for captive F8s, yet, Fishbase.org and IUCN redlist say F8s are freshwater fish.
Even more obscure is the claim of some that full marine works well, and that it is "debated" whether or not they live in full marine as adults. Recent statement, no documentation.
Several "random" websites with fish profiles recommend SG 1.005-1.008. No documentation.
On here, there seems to be more or less agreed that low end brackish is best, like 1.003-1.005, which is supported by RTR's long term experiment, unfortunately not published. I can't find on here which other salinity levels he tested.
On the Dutch (?) puffer forum, and also by "expert(s)" on a different group, it is recently claimed that adult F8s need a salinity of SG 1.010-1.015. No documentation.
Yet another more relaxed advice is that any low to middling salinity is just fine. Recent statement by, among others, someone whom I believe is a marine biologist.
The scientific literature says little about this, at least in the the narrow selection of publications I have had access to. The only paper I can think of that mention an SG for F8, is the paper by Doi et al. (2015), and they kept adult F8s in an SG of 1.015 for several years before the spawning experiment. Spawning was induced by lowering the salinity to 1.007. Eggs were hatched and fry reared in SG 1.005-1.007. Would the fact that they actually managed to spawn them indicate that they had been kept under optimal conditions? Or maybe it was optimal for breeding, but not necessarily for long term captive life? What made those Japanese scientist keep them at that salinity in the first place? The paper does not say.
Can someone please go out and attach GPS's to those mysterious fishies and measure the salinity along their trail, during their whole life span?? I'm kind'a obsessed, sorry...
The enigma of "optimal" F8 salinity level...
- Pufferpunk
- Queen Admin
- Posts: 32773
- Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 11:06 am
- Gender: Female
- My Puffers: Filbert, the 12" T lineatus
Punkster, the 4" red T miurus
Mongo, the 4" A modestus
2 T biocellatus
C valentini
C coranata
C papuan
Also kept:
lorteti
DPs
suvattii
burrfish
T niphobles - Location (country): USA, Greenville, SC
- Location: Chicago
- Contact:
Re: The enigma of "optimal" F8 salinity level...
I'll go with RTR, EVERY single time there is controversy!
You are getting sleepy... you only hear the sound of my voice... you must do water changes... water changes... water changes... water changes...
"The solution to pollution is dilution!"
"The solution to pollution is dilution!"
Re: The enigma of "optimal" F8 salinity level...
I agree with her. Living into late teens in low end brackish is enough proof for me.
- Iliveinazoo
- Fahaka Puffer
- Posts: 826
- Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 8:09 am
- Gender: Male
- My Puffers: 1xFigure 8
- Location (country): UK
- Location: Southampton
Re: The enigma of "optimal" F8 salinity level...
There was someone on this forum that posted a photo of a Figure 8 in its natural habitat. I'm 'almost' sure that the salinity was around SG1.002 but I can't remember what the temperature was.
They most likely are predominantly freshwater fish that travel into estuaries every now and again. I would also hazard a guess that water hardness is more important than salinity in keeping Figure 8's but it is easier to guarantee harder water with the addition of marine salt.
They most likely are predominantly freshwater fish that travel into estuaries every now and again. I would also hazard a guess that water hardness is more important than salinity in keeping Figure 8's but it is easier to guarantee harder water with the addition of marine salt.