{"id":154,"date":"2010-10-01T03:29:09","date_gmt":"2010-10-01T07:29:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thepufferforum.com\/forum\/library\/water-filtration\/newtanksyndroments\/"},"modified":"2011-05-14T11:05:30","modified_gmt":"2011-05-14T15:05:30","slug":"newtanksyndroments","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thepufferforum.com\/forum\/library\/tnk-mgr\/newtanksyndroments\/","title":{"rendered":"II. New Tank Syndrome, NTS"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>New Tank Syndrome, NTS<\/p>\n<p>Robert T. Ricketts<\/p>\n<p>There are all  but constant questions on the boards relating the trials, tribulations,  and assorted woes associated with a newly set aquarium. Very few novice  tank-keepers have any realistic concept of the complexity of the system  they are starting. This is no doubt a good thing \u2013 if most of us really  knew up front how complex aquarium ecology is, we would probably never  start \u2013 and think of all the fun we would have missed.  The  micro-ecology of out tanks is complex.  The development of the  micro-ecology is a tad demanding of attention, but the chores involved  are not complex.  After stability is reached, handling is not complex at  all.  As with many of the things we do, once you understand something  about it, it is relatively easy.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>The first hurdle a novice must face  is the set-up itself \u2013 the tank, the filter(s), heater, lights,  substrate, aquascaping, timers, buckets, test kits, and the water.  Making intelligent choices with no background is all but impossible.    Original selections are made on the advice of the store staff from which  it is purchased, the experiences of friends, and maybe even the  Internet. All that is going to be out of scope for this brief article,  it would require a book at the least.  It would be colored strongly by  my own personal preferences.  What I like to use may not be as friendly  for you, and vice-versa. Personal preferences are just that, personal  and individual.  With a bit of experience, everyone learns what  equipment they like or don\u2019t like, find easy to work with or not so  easy, and that does the job they need. Then they can make wiser choices  for equipment upgrades or for new additional tanks.  It may also be  better that they do not know up front that if they like the hobby at  all, there will be more tanks.<\/p>\n<p>The next hurdle is getting healthy  stock. If you don\u2019t already know fish, how can you tell what goes with  what, what tank size is proper, and are the beasts healthy? That too is  out of scope here, too much information is required. It must be learned  by reading and questioning, and is not likely to happen before the first  tank is started. There the Web is an invaluable tool.  You can gather  multiple opinions and ideas, selecting or building on those to what  suits you.  How many people started in this hobby with a quarantine tank  as the initial purchase, or maybe the second purchase after a selection  of \u201cgood\u201d reference materials?  I did not.<\/p>\n<p>The primary  condition discussed under the heading of \u201cNew Tank Syndrome\u201d (NTS) is  nitrification, or \u201ccycling\u201d the tank. I have discussed this previously  in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thepufferforum.com\/forum\/library\/water-filtration\/aquariummicrobespart1\/\" class=\"postlink\">Aquarium Microbes, Part 1: Nitrification Bacteria<\/a>  and suggest that you read that for a high-level discussion of the  process. If you are in the planning stages of a new tank and have not  yet started, I strongly suggest that you use \u201cfishless cycling\u201d as  popularized by Dr. Chris Cow in earlier articles.Those articles and the  process detailed there will get you over the largest single difficulty  facing the novice hobbyist. So those bacterial development phases are  not going to be repeated here either.<\/p>\n<p>It does need emphasis that NTS  is more than just cycling for the nitrification bacteria. There are  millions of other microbes and infusoria that must be in balance in our  tanks. These others, the heterotrophic bacteria, fungi, algae,  infusoria, copepods, nematodes, etc., are just as important to us as the  lithotrophs (nitrification bacteria), but much more rarely cause death  and destruction by themselves or by their lack than would lack of the  lithotrophs. So we don\u2019t talk about them as much. Any one of these can  overgrow its \u201cnormal\u201d population density due to excess or imbalance in  the food and consumer groups in the \u201cyoung\u201d tank. This was previously  discussed in an article but from a different angle: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thepufferforum.com\/forum\/library\/water-filtration\/aquariummicrobespart2\/\" class=\"postlink\">Aquarium Microbes, Part 2: Other small critters<\/a><\/p>\n<p>For  a fish-only tank (FO), in my experience the whole NTS period is on the  order of three months. If any drastic, out of the ordinary practices are  required during that three months (medication of the tank, for an  example), the clock resets to near zero. Algae outbreaks (attached, or  free-floating in the form of \u201cgreen water\u201d), cloudy water (gray or smoky  appearance from free-floating or swimming bacteria), fungus on food  particles at the surface of the substrate, etc. are either expected, or  should not cause shock or dismay, if or when they appear. Most or all of  these episodes are transient and will clear without extreme measures by  the hobbyist. Vacuuming the substrate for leftovers before they decay  is not extreme. Nor is moderating food input extreme in my view. Cloudy  water of whatever color is likely to be self-limited and to clear  without intervention. If it is extreme (opaque) and competing with the  fish for oxygen (fish are at the surface breathing rapidly), increasing  mechanical filtration and frequent (daily to every other day) cleaning  of mechanical filters will help.  Please do not disturb biofilters any  more than necessary while doing this. Cloudy water seems to be a  peculiar situation where extra water changes tend to be only of  temporary aid.  They may even prolong the outbreak by providing  refreshed trace minerals needed by the bloom. Medication or flocculants  are the same; they effectively cause catastrophic collapse of the bloom,  and can easily overload the filters and deplete the oxygen in the tank  to the risk of the fish. If such things are used (I do not, and do not  recommend their use), mechanical filtration maintenance, water partial  exchanges, and vacuuming must be done to protect the needed bacteria in  the biofilters as well as the fish in the system. In extreme or  prolonged green water blooms (perhaps over two to three weeks), dark  treatment by completely blocking light to the tank for several days may  help. Mechanical filtration should be boosted and frequently maintained  during and after this practice as well. Also do not neglect routine  maintenance just because a bloom is occurring. Regular maintenance helps  keep water conditions stable, which should aid the stabilization of the  tank microflora and microfauna. The most extreme measure I ever take in  the face of blooms is added mechanical filtration (up to diatom  filtration) with very frequent cleaning of mechanical filter media to  remove as many nutrients as possible from the system.  In this case,  those excess nutrient are not dissolved, but are incorporated into the  bodies of the free-floating or swimming bacteria or algae.<\/p>\n<p>Planted  tanks are a somewhat different case from FO. You face the same  requirement for establishment of balance of all the microscopic or  near-microscopic life in the tank as you do in FO tanks.  Plus you have  the requirement to establish the plants themselves. Plants do not react  as quickly as do the microbes to changes in water composition, nutrient  availability, substrate differences, lighting strength and spectrum. But  they do adapt. If you are a plant novice as well, you are likely to be  adding either too little or too much macro- and micronutrients, quite  possibly in excess of what the not-yet-adapted plants can handle. And  you may lack certain required nutrients (bio-available carbon is  commonly limiting in novice setups). Algae can react or adapt more  quickly and easily (or just by selective pressure on which type can take  advantage of the situation most easily) than can higher plants.  Algae  can make do with lower levels of many or most nutrients. So you might  generate algae heaven, coating everything and further stressing the  higher vascular plants by blocking their light.<\/p>\n<p>Personally, I can  only rarely initiate a fully planted tank in the aquascape I want it to  have at maturity. I consider the NTS period for planted tanks to be at  least twice as long as for FO tanks, that is, up to six months minimum  time to long-term stability. To the tools discussed for FO tanks, you  (and I) may need to add a significant support crew for help. This crew  may include animals to do cleaning chores: small or dwarf plecos and\/or  Otocinclus, Siamese Algae Eaters (SAEs), American (or Florida) Flag Fish  (FFF), Cherry Barbs, mollies, snails (red ramshorns, common pond,  Malaysian Trumpet Snails\/MTS), Amano shrimp (Caridina japonica) or other  algae-eating shrimp. The plant help crew also includes fast growing  (i.e., rapid nutrient absorbing) plants such as many stem plants which  may be either rooted or floating, and water sprite (really a rosette  plant but also either rooted or floating), or true floaters such as  duckweed. These fast growing floating plants may be the most valuable  helpers, in that they can suck up excess nutrients with amazing speed to  out-compete the algae even in a novice tank. The \u2018floaters\u201d can also  provide some degree of shade for the \u201cpermanent\u201d plants while they  establish, comparable to the use of a lath house or shade cloth in the  outdoor garden. These plants are also relatively easily harvested and  removed from the tank to control degree of shading and nutrient  absorption. The animal crew, selected in part for the type of algae  (they do have individual preferences for different types of algae), is  quite likely to have to be present in significantly higher numbers than  can be supported once the tank matures. As I remove the temporary plants  and as any algae load decreases, I\u2019m removing portions of the animate  work crew as well. This too can be compared to the outdoor garden, where  new plantings require extra attention in watering and weeding, mulching  and feeding. More established garden areas need much less work, so we  need fewer workers to tend the aquatic garden as it matures. There are  learning processes involved in planted tanks that are different and in  addition to those of FO tanks, but they are easier to learn with extra  helpers during the NTS phase of the tank<\/p>\n<p>If we were all Amano,  we might get away with setting finished aquascapes. I\u2019m not that  accomplished, and I would not expect any novice to be. I have an  advantage that much of the plant stock for any given new tank of mine is  likely to come from other existing and established tanks under my care,  or from young plants in my grow-out tanks. This minimizes their  adaptation to me and my water and lighting, and gives me additional  advantage in that I am already familiar with the growth in my tanks  under my particular care (or lack thereof) of the plant. But even with  those advantages, I still set just the framework of the tank in my mind,  top it off with floaters and stock it with soft plant herbivores (read  as: algae eaters). This gives the aquascape-to-come protection and  \u201cbuffering\u201d (not pH, but from algae competition) while it develops.  Those extras, both fast-growing plants and worker animals, I know and  plan to be non-permanent, and the transients are removed gradually as  the tank in my mind achieves reality. When I can see that tank in front  of me, and the cleaning crews have been reduced to long-term maintenance  levels, I can comfortably tell myself that I have passed the chance of  NTS and can start the next project.<\/p>\n<p>NTS Water changes:<\/p>\n<p>This  is easier to understand than the regular water change math for  established and stable tanks with mature biofilters, as it is not  long-term.  Each water change during cycling is individual.  If you have  hobby-test-kit detectable ammonia or nitrate, I would suggest doing a  50% partial to reduce the hazardous material to or below detectable  levels.  Any detectable ammonia or nitrite is, at the least, a risk to  the fish.  It is doing some damage if we can detect it and if it is  there for any period of time.  Only undectable levels should be  considered \u201csafe\u201d.  As a sidelight, undectable ammonia or nitrite or  nitrate of anything else measured by a hobby test kit does not mean a  true zero, that none of the material tested is present.  It means only  \u201cnot detectable\u201d by the kit.  Those metabolites are still present, just  not at detectable levels.   This is an important point to understand.   So long as you have living fish or inverts in the tank, ammonia and\/or  nitrite will be there.  They hopefully will be below detectable levels  so we will not worry about them.  If testing after the partial still  shows detectable positive result for either ammonia or nitrite, do  another water change.  The total dissolved solids and other water  parameters should not be so far away from tap or source water levels  that there is any risk involved in large scale partials.<\/p>\n<p>This article originally appeared in AquaSource Magazine.  It has been edited and expanded for this site, Sept. 2010<\/p>\n<p>Robert T. Ricketts, a.k.a. RTR<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>New Tank Syndrome, NTS Robert T. Ricketts There are all but constant questions on the boards relating the trials, tribulations, and assorted woes associated with a newly set aquarium. Very few novice tank-keepers have any realistic concept of the complexity of the system they are starting. This is no doubt a good thing \u2013 if &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thepufferforum.com\/forum\/library\/tnk-mgr\/newtanksyndroments\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">II. New Tank Syndrome, NTS<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-154","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-tnk-mgr"],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thepufferforum.com\/forum\/library\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/154","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thepufferforum.com\/forum\/library\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thepufferforum.com\/forum\/library\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thepufferforum.com\/forum\/library\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thepufferforum.com\/forum\/library\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=154"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.thepufferforum.com\/forum\/library\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/154\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thepufferforum.com\/forum\/library\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=154"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thepufferforum.com\/forum\/library\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=154"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thepufferforum.com\/forum\/library\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=154"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}